It’s hard to be a man; hard to live up to the demands that come with the dominant conception of masculinity, of the tough guy.
Masculinity is a conception now?
What is masculine anyway? According to this definition:
-pertaining to or characteristic of a man or men: masculine attire.
-having qualities traditionally ascribed to men, as strength and boldness.
I like men. Real men who aren’t afraid to be just THAT: fearless, strong, steady, forward, clear thinking. I like the John Waynes of this world; I like the cowboys. The Marlboro Man.
On a quiet street in Washington DC, there is a memorial to men:
TO THE BRAVE MEN
WHO PERISHED
IN THE WRECK
OF THE TITANIC
APRIL 15 1912
THEY GAVE THEIR
LIVES THAT WOMEN
AND CHILDREN
MIGHT BE SAVED
One of the men on board that fateful voyage was overheard to say this:
“We’ve dressed up in our best and are prepared to go down like gentlemen.”– Mr Benjamin Guggenheim of New York was offered a seat on a lifeboat. He was given a life jacket and had a free ride to safety. Instead, he removed his life jacket and gave it to a third class woman, dressed himself up in his finest, had a stiff drink and awaited his certain death.
~~~
They don’t make them like that anymore, or according to this author’s opinion, they shouldn’t make them like that anymore.
So, guys, I have an idea — maybe it’s time we stop trying. Maybe this masculinity thing is a bad deal, not just for women, but for us.
We need to get rid of the whole idea of masculinity. It’s time to abandon the claim that there are certain psychological or social traits that inherently come with being biologically male. If we can get past that, we have a chance to create a better world for men and women.
It might be hard for you to be a man, perhaps, but that doesn’t mean all men find it difficult to be who they are. We don’t need to get rid of anything except gays who promote this line of thinking. The soft, weak, sweet and teary eyed men of this world will destroy it. I don’t want real men to change.
That dominant conception of masculinity in U.S. culture is easily summarized: Men are assumed to be naturally competitive and aggressive, and being a real man is therefore marked by the struggle for control, conquest and domination. A man looks at the world, sees what he wants and takes it. Men who don’t measure up are wimps, sissies, girls. The worst insult one man can hurl at another — whether it’s boys on the playground or CEOs in the boardroom — is the accusation that a man is like a woman. Although the culture acknowledges that men can in some situations have traits traditionally associated with women (caring, compassion, tenderness), in the end it is men’s strength-expressed-as-toughness that defines us and must trump any female-like softness. Those aspects of masculinity must prevail for a man to be a “real man.”
It’s the truth and it’s how I like it. I don’t like men who wimper and whine and cry like babies. I see that as a weakness. As is being sensitive…and soft spoken and passive.
I look to men for strength and support. I look to men for sound emotion-free advice and guidance. I look to men for some sense of control- and that comforts me. A real man knows the right moments to be to be caring and compassionate and, yes, tender- but these moments are rare and special and not something I want to see all the time. I want men to be rough and tough and competitive and yes, aggressive- because I know these traits would protect me when and if I ever needed that.
My female ancestors also looked to men for strength, and aggressiveness. Their very survival depended upon this. The men did the hunting for food and worked the farmlands to feed his family. And they defended this family at all costs.
That’s not to suggest, of course, that every man adopts that view of masculinity. But it is endorsed in key institutions and activities — most notably in business, the military and athletics — and is reinforced through the mass media. It is particularly expressed in the way men — straight and gay alike — talk about sexuality and act sexually.
Oh please. Part of being masculine is about sex. Men are sexual beings and there is nothing wrong with that, at ALL. In fact it is natural and normal. I would question the manliness of any GUY who wasn’t sexually suggestive at times.
That view of masculinity is dangerous for women. It leads men to seek to control “their” women and define their own pleasure in that control, which leads to epidemic levels of rape and battery. But this view of masculinity is toxic for men as well.
Bull shit. Pure utter bullshit. Real men don’t try to control women; they aren’t serial rapists and murderers and such. Those who do these acts are cowards. The real men of the world will do anything to protect the women they love…real men worship the ground women walk on. Real men want to provide for the women they love- they want them to have everything they need to raise a family. And real men want to please their women in every way.
Of course there are obvious physical differences between men and women — average body size, hormones, reproductive organs. There may be other differences rooted in our biology that we don’t understand. Yet it’s also true that men and women are more similar than we are different, and that given the pernicious effects of centuries of patriarchy and its relentless devaluing of things female, we should be skeptical of the perceived differences.
Men and women are different; each compliments the other. One lacks what the other offers. We balance each other out. Men are sometimes too assertive and women are often times too submissive. When this happens that balance goes off keel a little. Most of us know ourselves well enough to see this when it happens and correct it. Women will stand up for themselves when they have had enough; and men will do the same. The exact method we each use to communicate this may be different, but the point gets across. Human kind would not have survived if we hadn’t figured out how to get along.
We identify masculine tendencies toward competition, domination and violence because we see patterns of differential behavior; men are more prone to such behavior in our culture. We can go on to observe and analyze the ways in which men are socialized to behave in those ways, toward the goal of changing those destructive behaviors. That analysis is different from saying that admirable human qualities present in both men and women are somehow primarily the domain of one gender. To assign them to a gender is misguided and demeaning to the gender that is then assumed to not possess them to the same degree. Once we start saying “strength and courage are masculine traits,” it leads to the conclusion that woman are not as strong or courageous.
I don’t think men have destructive behaviors. Yes, they do stupid things at times- usually to attract women. Usually it is the young man who does these things. He is showing off. He is still learning. The stupid things don’t teach violence or domination.
I know many a real man who has been very compassionate about issues important to him. Does that make him feminine? No. I also know men who have called me couragous and strong for surviving some of things I have experienced. Does that make me masculine? Hardly.
Of course, if we are going to jettison masculinity, we have to scrap femininity along with it. We have to stop trying to define what men and women are going to be in the world based on extrapolations from physical sex differences. That doesn’t mean we ignore those differences when they matter, but we have to stop assuming they matter everywhere.
And who determines just WHEN these things matter? Who writes the rules on that?
So lets be gender neutral and ignore our differences. Let’s be gone with all the physical and emotional variables that define who we are. Let’s all be equal. Sounds like we should be identical robots. No thanks. I have emotions and irrational thoughts at times. I experience fear and anger as well. I am apt to overeact to things, and I’m moody once in a while. I’m a woman and I am proud of that. I can’t change that. I don’t want to change that. And I don’t think men have to change- they don’t need to go soft.
I don’t think the planet can long survive if the current conception of masculinity endures. We face political and ecological challenges that can’t be met with this old model of what it means to be a man. At the more intimate level, the stakes are just as high. For those of us who are biologically male, we have a simple choice: We men can settle for being men, or we can strive to be human beings.
History has proven this author wrong here. Mankind has survived quite well. I dare say it is because of this concept, masculinity, that this is true. I also say that if men were to change, to become this kinder, softer version written of by this author, humankind would soon cease to exist.
There are two forms of human beings. A man. And a woman.
We need real men. We need more cowboys. More John Wayne. More Benjamin Guggenheim.
I want to provide a warm and welcoming home to men- with the fruits of their labor readily available for them. I want men to be men, not sissies and girly gurls. I want men to do stupid attention seeking stunts to get my attention. I want men to be sexual beings. I want men to compete in their work so that they can earn a decent living to provide for their families. I want men to continue running into burning towers to rescue people; I want men to give up their seats on the lifeboats so that women and children can live; I want men to go to the war fields and fight off the enemies who are trying to kill me. Men start wars and men end them. Men have saved mankind from itself.
***UPDATE***
Ogre has thoughts about Mr. Jensen’s article.