Comments on: Let Javona go in peace?

By: Carol

Carol — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:06:38 +0000

How can someone equate starving someone to death to “letting Javona go in peace.” Just because she is unconscious and can’t voice her discomfort over the starvation doesn’t mean she doesn’t feel it. Killing via starvation (removing the feeding tube) is still killing.

By: ~Raven

~Raven — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:40:20 +0000

Actually AOW, she’s 12.

By: ~Raven

~Raven — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:40:05 +0000

Francis, you’re correct. Add to this, though, a more and more common thought that it’s OK not to fight for life anymore. The disregard of human beings who might just need some TIME. Society has no use for those who need that. I also suspect there is a COST factor in all this: Who’s going to pay for Javona’s care either at the hospital or nursing home?

It’s ugly to me, that her parents seem so intent to see her die as well. Damn. Mothers never used to be like this.

By: Always On Watch

Always On Watch — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:56:47 +0000

Javona is only 16! Seems to me that she deserves more than a few short months to see if the docs are wrong in their assessment.

By: Francis W. Porretto

Francis W. Porretto — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:45:34 +0000

You know why, dear. The termination of this unfortunate young woman -- or, failing that, having her shuffled off to some warehouse for the comatose where she can be neglected to death -- is a primary objective of those who disdain human life and celebrate death. The sort who celebrated when Terri Schindler-Schiavo was murdered. The sort who call partial-birth abortion a "safe medical procedure." The sort who think Amy Richards was merely being sensible. The sort who think Toni Vernelli is a trailblazer for having her tubes tied as an environmental protection measure. The sort who agree with Eric Pianka that 90% of the human race simply must be eliminated as "fat biomass." We're looking at a routine sally from the death cults. The sort we've forgotten how to oppose.